The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep. Procedural nom following rejection of speedy. Original tagger (SatyrTN) has expressed a 'keep' opinion below and there are no other delete votes. WjBscribe 04:05, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apartment (burlesque orchestra)[edit]

This was listed for speedy deletion; I kinda felt it was borderline, but I didn't necessairily feel its good enough either. There area few sources which prove reviews, though I'm not sure about the level of the publications. Other claims are a bit unverified.

Basiciall, I thought it was better than the average speedy, but not sure enough to say whether or not its good enough - so opening it up to debate Robdurbar 13:29, 13 February 2007 (UTC) •[reply]

Speedy keep Woah steady on the page has only been up 5 hours and only One minute it got a speedy. As as you say borderline, give the initial editor at least a week to add some more information, or to prove notability. However a quick google search shows it has been wrapped up, but lets not jump the gun. ^Khukri 14:06, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep My bad - this one's actually turning into something. I was hasty in my SD tag. -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 14:56, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep, I agree. Lets assume good faith here, when it appears to be valid article and at first glance it checks out lets not be trying to delete it only seconds after it was created. Mathmo ^Talk 16:13, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.