The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. howcheng {chat} 20:58, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Antenarrative[edit]

Neologism. A slightly tricky case: like Oganization story above, this technically cites external sources, but they seem to stem from the author of the article itself, making the page original research. It is also, by and large, incomprehensible. I've had whole classes on narrative theory, for crying out loud, and it wasn't all as confusing as this. Anville 16:53, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Wow. Note that article references two works by Boje, and author is Dboje, which makes it perilously close to original research for my tastes. Bikeable 18:40, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Josh Parris#: 00:49, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. It is actually a very interesting article, and is an important contribution to narration theory. See also the links to Tamara, (play):Harrypotter 18:31, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Bikeable. Stifle 21:43, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.