The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep ~ Arjun 03:12, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anneli Rufus[edit]

Anneli Rufus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Prod tag was removed without comment. If this seemingly nn author meets WP:BIO there is no evidence of it in the article. janejellyroll 00:42, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

oops i am tired Feeeshboy 06:29, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.sundaysalon.org/archives.asp?offset=10

http://www.kpfa.org/archives/index.php?arch=9741

http://www.wnyc.org/shows/bl/episodes/2005/08/16

http://www.wnyc.org/shows/bl/episodes/2003/03/31

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=1070607

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2003/05/04/LV284573.DTL (San Francisco Chronicle: Berkeley author Anneli Rufus shares the pleasures of a misunderstood breed) ]

http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/news/special_packages/inquirer_magazine/13934871.htm (Philadelphia Inquirer: This Way Up - Only the lonely know... how contenting and liberating it is to be a loner. Extroverts should take heed) ]

http://www.sptimes.com/2003/03/06/news_pf/Floridian/Loner____or_paranoiac.shtml (St. Petersburg Times: Loner . . . or paranoiac?) ] —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 163.192.21.44 (talk) 21:47, 13 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.