The original result was No consensus. However this debate has been reopen for discussion by Gwernol (talk · contribs). Mostly Rainy 14:18, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Resistance is futile! - Mailer Diablo 20:30, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable person/persona. o/s/p 23:12, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
(reindenting)OK, this will be my last comment on the issue here since things seem to be getting dragged out. To answer your points, it's not a case of different standards because the articles in question (as far as I can tell) haven't been put forward to AfD. In other words, no standards whatsoever have been applied; there's no standards regarding what articles can be created, only what articles can pass AfD. I know WP:BIO is not an exhaustive list, but there still needs to be some claim to wide notability and as things stand I'm just not seeing it. Finally, on the issue of links to his reviews of games, I personally wouldn't have a problem with providing external links at the bottom of the relevant articles; given that it's likely he's the only one to have reviewed them it would seem to fit within WP:EL. Anyway, like I said I'm bowing out of arguing on here, but feel free to respond on here, and if you want to get my responses drop me a line on my talk page. --Daduzi talk 15:32, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep this page. he is very popular with 300,000 total views of his videos. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CaptainMe (talk • contribs)
Yes, some of those articles would not survive an AFD. What does that have to do with anything? Recury 19:57, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]