The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 20:46, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ancient Tree Forum[edit]

Ancient Tree Forum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

nothird party sources. The "archived copy" that doesn;t say what its an archived copy of, turns out to be an archived copy of their web site. DGG ( talk ) 00:28, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Crazy suggestion, this is an active and respected organisation, the article just needs some effort put into sources. I'll add a couple. Stub Mandrel (talk) 09:07, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:41, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:41, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, as is I don't see how this even remotely meets notability. --Surv1v4l1st ^{▌Talk|Contribs▌} 21:07, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, all sources are primary. (Also in a web search.) Geschichte (talk) 21:02, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.