The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 23:50, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alan Stevens (media consultant)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet the requirements of WP:BIO. There are many brief mentions in RSs but nothing substantial about the subject. Searches including "which?" and "consumer association" (his former employers) didn't turn up anything useful. SmartSE (talk) 23:15, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - all of the live references merely quote the subject; they do not discuss the subject and they do not indicate his notability.--Rpclod (talk) 02:07, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:11, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:11, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG , only passing references to this person. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:00, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Most people who give a TED talk are notable, but he has never given one, despite what the article claims. The actual reference is to a TEDx talk, which anyone can give. Did the paid editor who wrote this not know the difference? I'm beginning to think this is a question of WP:CIR. DGG ( talk ) 16:19, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - weak sources, seems very promotional. Elgatodegato (talk) 18:38, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:RS only brief mentions created by a paid editor and clearly Promotional .Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 13:16, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails lacks WP:RS and WP:GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 00:42, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.