The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jaranda wat's sup 00:25, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable family name, no non-trivial independent sources located Orderinchaos78 01:34, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless a source can be provided. --Duke of Duchess Street 01:46, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delete-if one became President of Nigeria, that would warrant a keep or expansion. Chris 01:48, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable --BenWhitey 02:09, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There seems to be a general consensus that surnames are non-notable, though they are perfectly acceptable as disambiguation pages. A recent AfD on the Jewish surname Pinkus seems to confirm this, as well. There is a category for surnames though all names listed there link to disambiguation pages. --The Way 02:16, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
But it will be a useless disambiguation page, because there are no people in Wikipedia of that name. MER-C 08:03, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. MER-C 08:03, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Unless sources are provided, delete per nom. Bigtop 16:34, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No indication of notability.--Yannismarou 15:14, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No clear assertion of notability of the family, as opposed to one of its members. No references. WMMartin 18:20, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.