The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:21, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AReputation[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is about a website that does not seem to be notable, possible COI Carwile2 ^{*Shoot me a message*} 15:34, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:57, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:57, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:57, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete clearly promotion. Especially amused by saying it has something to with a globe! It sounds like the usual company that gets paid to write glowing "reviews" or other misleading user-generated content? Hard to tell if they are legit or not from the article. Not even a good advertisement, since they cannot even write English. W Nowicki (talk) 16:31, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- Another WP:ADVERT from a NN PR company. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:33, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.