Hi! Can you please tell me the name of your previous account? Thanks! --WhiteWriterspeaks 22:38, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Zetatrans! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Eiii! Take it steady, please read WP:No Personal Attacks. The comment you made on Climate of Kosovo is not allowed here, even if you write in Serbian. It can land you the block and I wouldn't like to see that in light of your constructive edit. Please assure me you won't make attacks like that in future. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 20:01, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
Interestingly, you cannot even make personal remarks let alone "attacks". I was once blocked for a comment I didn't know constituted an attack. Edit as you please but if you have any questions, ask me on my talk page any time. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 20:20, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 14:52, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello! I thought you may be interested in joining WikiProject Montenegro. We work on creating, expanding and making general changes to Montenegro related articles. If you would be interested in joining feel free to visit the Participants Page! Thank You. |
--Antidiskriminator (talk) 13:54, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Đe si, kralju? Great to see another fellow Montenegrin editor here on Wikipedia. I've been rather inactive lately but I'm making an effort to be more active. I've been noticing a trend in your edits on the position of Montenegrin Cyrillic. Previously, WhiteWriter did mention that Montenegrin is not an ISO-recognized language, and he's right, it's not. Wikipedians follow international standards to maintain neutrality, and as you know, Montenegrin language itself is a rather controversial topic even in Montenegro. Crnogorski-srpski jezik? Are you kidding me? Hell, I don't agree with the way the Government accepted a standardization of the language that gives it a certain Serbian feel to it instead of promoting the local dialects spoken in Montenegro. I can rant on and on about the topic, but long story short, that's just my two cents worth. Back on point. Seeing that the whole controversy here is whether to use Montenegrin Cyrillic or Serbian Cyrillic, personally I feel if the title is written in Montenegrin/Serbian/whatever, you can just write Milo Đukanović ([[Cyrillic]]: Мило Ђукановић); if the title is in English and needs a translation, then perhaps using Serbo-Croatian can be a good alternative: University of Montenegro (((lang-sh|Univerzitet Crne Gore / Универзитет Црне Горе))) The template yields the whole Serbo-Croatian: Text without typing it all out. The Serbo-Croatian alternative is popularly used on Wiktionary. I mean, you can continue to use "Montenegrin" like I (try to) do but don't be surprised when your edits are reverted or changed to "Serbian".
Hope this helps. Živjeli, brate!
This message is being sent to you let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You do not need to participate however, you are invited to help find a resolution. The thread is "List of populated places in Serbia". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot operator / talk 21:31, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on International Court of Justice advisory opinion on Kosovo's declaration of independence. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. TippyGoomba (talk) 04:54, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text ((unblock|Your reason here ~~~~)) below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Sandstein 16:20, 6 May 2013 (UTC) |