Hello there Zblace, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you ever need editing help visit Wikipedia:How does one edit a page and experiment at Wikipedia:Sandbox. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Wikipedia:Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Village pump. BTW, just because some text is from a free software site that doesn't necessarily mean the text is free content. Cheers! --maveric149
A tag has been placed on Re-x requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding ((hangon))
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. MuffledThud (talk) 12:02, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Men's Cup has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://synchrowords.blogspot.com/2009/04/mens-cup-2009.html. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 15:42, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Men's Cup do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://syncdifferent.blogspot.com. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:24, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have enabled.
On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true
. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false
in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer be able to have them marked as minor by default. For more information on what a minor edit is, see WP:MINOR or feel to get in touch.
Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 23:31, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
The article Ana Srsen has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the ((prod blp)) tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. AstroCog (talk) 10:47, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Otokultivator requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mifter (talk) 16:05, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Otokultivator requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ronhjones (Talk) 21:00, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, thank you for taking the time to create a page here. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you created yourself. Because Wikipedia policy does not allow the creator of the page to remove deletion tags, an automated program has replaced the deletion tag you removed from Otokultivator. Please do not continue to remove the deletion tag, instead, if you disagree with the deletion, you can follow these steps:
Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do. For further help about the deletion, you could contact the user who first placed the tag or a highly active user who is willingly to help with deletion. This message was left by a bot, so please do not contact the bot about the deletion. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 21:03, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marcus Urban is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcus Urban until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – PeeJay 14:18, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
The article Christa Membrandt has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the ((prod blp)) tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Avono♂ (talk) 21:51, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on ConstantVzw, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 15:42, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page NGBK to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Kindzmarauli (talk) 16:27, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi, please do some more research on how to correctly add articles to Wikipedia. Kindzmarauli (talk) 16:39, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent edit to Constant added the name of an apparently non-notable entity. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article to establish notability. If you wish to create such an article, please confirm that your subject is notable according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you! FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 17:55, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Kindzmarauli (talk) 18:58, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Constant. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 20:55, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Please stop attacking other contributors, as you did on this edit to User talk:FoCuSandLeArN. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:07, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
What on earth are you considering editing or attacking? - I was ignored for my work and just wasted 2 hours of my time in trying to reason with you over 2 pages - one that is deleted for no good reason and other I tried to setup and your smarter-than-all editor decides that he takes over and renames the institution! (than I had to remove the page because it became faulty). You people have no care for content - just act over formalities and in most automatic inconsiderate way Zblace (talk) 21:17, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Men's Cup is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Men's Cup until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ViperSnake151 Talk 15:55, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Multimedijalni institut requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.mi2.hr/en/multimedijalni-institut/misija/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick(Talk) 12:07, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Multimedia Institute requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://mi2.hr/en/multimedijalni-institut/misija. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Moneytrees🌴Talk🌲Help out at CCI! 13:37, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. Moneytrees🌴Talk🌲Help out at CCI! 13:38, 14 May 2020 (UTC)I saw you deleted my article and blocked me as due to Copyright?! but Multimedia Institute is fighting copyright, localizing Creative Commons for Croatia and all of its content is under creative commons licenses! It is totally counter logic to do this --Zblace (talk) 13:50, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
You have an obvious conflict of interest and you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for an organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at Jimfbleak. The template ((Paid)) can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: ((paid|user=Zblace|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName)). If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message. Also read the following regarding writing an article:
Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:46, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
I can not argue in the way with a person who does not read content and keeps changing arguments. Multimedia Institute is respected and 20years + old. It hosted first Croatian presentation of Jimmy Wales /User:Jimbo Wales, localized Creative Commons, promoted open source and open content...yet you keep using all of these commercial accusations and copy/pasting inapplicable regulations. In terms of bias - yes I was one of the co-founders of this Not-for-Profit Civil Society and Community Organization and was paid to work there for about two years in early 2000s, but since then I am member like many others, because it is great and unique organization. If that disqualifies me from making a Wikipedia page on it, than be it. I will not use my time more with someone who has terrible way of communicating and abuses power. Thank you very much! --Zblace (talk) 09:01, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Christa Membrandt. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Vexations (talk) 19:07, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
This needs reliable sources for all statements made in the text - currently, essentially none of the content is refernced. Please don't put articles with such a lack of verifiable sourcing into mainspace. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 16:10, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
When you turned Krvavica into a DAB page, you may have overlooked WP:FIXDABLINKS. The change broke 295 links, which will have to be checked and fixed manually. Narky Blert (talk) 13:06, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
I am sorry for the effect caused, but was this avoidable? Krvavica is the name of few toponims and popular sausage...who ever did the page without searching first set the conditions for this :-/ Zblace (talk) 19:00, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi,
I am EMsmile, and I am a part of a group of people wishing to improve SDG-related articles on Wikipedia. We are organising this online SDG edit-a-thon during Global Goals Week, 18-26 September 2020. Please take part in it! If you have any questions about this work, please feel free to ask your question on the event's talk page here. The event page itself is here. EMsmile (talk) 07:46, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Zblace!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MapleSoy (talk) 03:06, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
|
Hi Zblace! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. —J. M. (talk) 12:05, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Haiku (operating system). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.—J. M. (talk) 12:15, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
An article you recently created, Skirt-bag, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 20:06, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
...ako hocete :-)
Pozdrav Z! Ovdje M. GretaMarichkova (talk) 10:01, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
Pozdrav od Katice — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anuktolkin (talk • contribs) 10:11, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello Z., thank you for listening to my lightning talk at WikiConference North America 2020. I wanted to ask you to check out the Sustainability Initiative page on Meta and to add your name to the list of supporters so that we can demonstrate the community's support for this effort. Thanks! --Gnom (talk) 23:18, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Zblace. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Christa Membrandt".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the ((db-afc))
, ((db-draft))
, or ((db-g13))
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:37, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi welcome to the edit-a-thon!--Nattes à chat (talk) 15:57, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, Zblace, and welcome to Women in Red. I'm glad to see you enjoyed yesterday's event and are now keen to contribute to our project. Back in 2011 you created a short biography of a women but there have not been any since. If you haven't already done so, it might therefore be useful for you to look through our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 13:00, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi from Edinburgh
Zahara k (talk) 17:37, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for joining us!
Stinglehammer (talk) 17:37, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Woo! Tsanders5555 (talk) 17:38, 28 January 2021 (UTC) |
Hi there! Thank you for your interest in our campaign to improve the public's knowledge about local newspapers. Time has flown since we got going in September, and our six month campaign ends in just a month! We'd like to check in with you about work you have done, or any articles you'd like to write or edit to do before we wrap up.
We published a mid-campaign report, highlighting strong work from several Wikipedia editors (both new wiki folks and veterans); contributions from Kristy Roschke's journalism course at Arizona State University; and strong engagement from groups like AfroCROWD and Wikimedians of the Caribbean.
As we begin our final push, we would love to learn what you have been working on, or help you with any challenges. We're hosting several informal video conference sessions in the next week. (If that format is no good for you, just let us know.) We'd love to hear what newspapers have caught your interest, any articles you've already written, and also any kind of support you could use in writing up newspapers that lack Wikipedia entries. We'll focus especially on newspapers of the Caribbean in our final month, as we continue to work on Black-owned U.S. newspapers, and newspapers of Washington State.
Please register for one of these Zoom meetings. If these times don't work for you, or if you hate Zoom, etc., just reply here (please include the text "[[User:Peteforsyth]] and [[User:Shanluan]]
" so we get notifications), and we'll find another way to connect with you.
We hope to hear from you soon! -Pete Forsyth (talk) 00:51, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
This user is a student editor in Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/Northwestern_University/Political_Theories_of_the_Rule_of_Law_(9_weeks) . |
Hello, Zblace, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 21:14, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:Diane-charlemagne-ist-tot- (cropped).jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the ((Non-free fair use)) tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 19:06, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Women in Red | March 2021, Volume 7, Issue 3, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 192, 193
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 05:03, 27 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hi! I noticed you added Ana Sršen to to-do list with the notice to check your English. A far better place to ask for help re fixing prose flow, grammar etc. is WP:GOCE/REQ. There is a queue and three active requests limit, but it is worth the wait. Cheers--Tomobe03 (talk) 16:04, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed that your article, Miranda Veljačić included substantial amounts of text reproduced near-verbatim from this article. I just wanted to remind you that contributions to Wikipedia need to be entirely in your own words. For copyright reasons, the article will need to be deleted. Guettarda (talk) 18:36, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Women in Red | April 2021, Volume 7, Issue 4, Numbers 184, 188, 194, 195, 196
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:17, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
An article you recently created, Ewa Majewska, is not suitable as written to remain published. The issues which led to it being declined still exist. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 12:14, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello! Thanks for your message. We had a first video done which is not the final one though. The person in charge still has not finished the long version so, yes, you can send it, and I will personally be glad to have it! Feel free to reach me anytime and let me know if you need some help for the Croatian Wikipedia's anniversary (and remind me the date so I can get Amical and our Viquipèdia to publicize it)! Don't be shy, it will be a pleasure to lend a hand to fellow wikipedians! Take real care, have a nice day! Let me know if you need more info about the video! Claudi/Capsot (talk) 19:43, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi Zblace, welcome to WP:SQUAT. Good luck with Squatting in Croatia, I'll be interested to read it! Please drop me a line if you need a hand with anything, cheers Mujinga (talk) 17:30, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Zblace. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Skirt-bag, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Skirt-bag, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hybrid. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
The Wikimedia LGBTQ+ User Group is holding online working days in May. As a member of WikiProject LGBT studies, editing on LGBTQ+ issues or if you identify as part of the LGBTQ+ community, come help us set goals, develop our organisation and structures, consider how to respond to issues faced by Queer editors, and plan for the next 12 months.
We will be meeting online for 3 half-days, 14–16 May at 1400–1730 UTC. While our working language is English, we are looking to accommodate users who would prefer to participate in other languages, including translation facilities.
More information, and registration details, at QW2021.--Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group 03:02, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Women in Red | May 2021, Volume 7, Issue 5, Numbers 184, 188, 197, 198
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:38, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A tag has been placed on The Children’s House (Rijeka, Croatia) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. nearlyevil665 09:21, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
Women in Red | June 2021, Volume 7, Issue 6, Numbers 184, 188, 196, 199, 200, 201
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:51, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | July 2021, Volume 7, Issue 7, Numbers 184, 188, 202, 203, 204, 205
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:07, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hi Zblace. I am well aware of the power imbalance between administrators and non-administrators. If you look into my history, you will see many attempts to redress that imbalance, indeed, as recently as my last 50 edits. However, I don't believe your solution - that of "[making] statements in anonymous way and backed by evidence diffs" is the right one. For one thing, context matters, as does reputation. If an individual has a history of harassment - they should not be able to make anonymous statements, with or without evidence. We have a number of individuals who are regularly harassed on Wikipedia - and an anonymous route for user management would lead to those individuals being horribly treated. The individual in question would be a significant targets of such harassment, as would much of our more diverse membership. Instead, I made a statement, months ago, backed by evidence that explained my concerns. The statement went largely ignored, and when further questions were requested, I re-iterated it.
The community is aware of my history. I have unblocked disruptive users, who have gone on to be disruptive. I have unblocked disruptive users who have not. I have worked against harassment. I have pushed for users to be able to vanish - I could go on. More than once - I have stepped outside the norms, because I believed the action I was taking was right. I'm still here - I am a member of the current Arbitration Committee, and I am certainly aware of the wider issues that are leading to the UCoC. I'm certainly happy to discuss any such issues. WormTT(talk) 10:45, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Women in Red | August 2021, Volume 7, Issue 8, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 206, 207
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:27, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hi. I'm Barkeep49, an editor and checkuser on English Wikipedia. Checkuser evidence from another wiki indicates that you are User:2020W and User:QueerSEE. I have blocked those two accounts as they do not appear to follow our rules that allow for alternative accounts. Further, QueerSEE created an article (now in another user's userspace) for which you have a clear conflict of interest. If I become aware of the creation/use of any other accounts or further editing which violates our conflict of interest guideline I will have to block this account as well. Barkeep49 (talk) 00:59, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Zblace. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ana Dana Beroš, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
Women in Red | September 2021, Volume 7, Issue 9, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 207, 208
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:31, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello, Zblace. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Selma Selman, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Zblace. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Squatting in Croatia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:04, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Zblace. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Le Zbor, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Zblace. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ana Dana Beroš".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:28, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Women in Red | October 2021, Volume 7, Issue 10, Numbers 184, 188, 209, 210, 211
Special event:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 01:38, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello, Zblace. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Squatting in Croatia".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:03, 3 October 2021 (UTC)