Hello, my apologies if my reversion of your edit at Alfred Marshall was in error. The incorrect formatting made it appear like a destructive edit, though I think I may have acted too quickly. Are all investopedia links considered spam (I don't know the site). Thanks. Jessicapierce (talk) 20:01, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello TaxAct2018, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of LayerOne, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Being part of a notable entity indicates importance/significance (WP:CCSI#CORP, WP:CCSI#ORG). If you are interested in learning more about how speedy deletion works, I have compiled a list of helpful pages at User:SoWhy/SDA. You can of course also contact me if you have questions. Thank you. SoWhy 16:07, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello TaxAct2018, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of South Gate High School, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 clearly excludes schools. If you are interested in learning more about how speedy deletion works, I have compiled a list of helpful pages at User:SoWhy/SDA. You can of course also contact me if you have questions. Thank you. SoWhy 16:07, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello TaxAct2018, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Jason Whitehorn, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: collaboration with multiple notable artists is a claim of significance. If you are interested in learning more about how speedy deletion works, I have compiled a list of helpful pages at User:SoWhy/SDA. You can of course also contact me if you have questions. Thank you. SoWhy 16:09, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello TaxAct2018, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Wayne Dalglish, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Playing a non-extra role in a notable movie/TV show indicates importance/significance (WP:CCSI#ACTOR). If you are interested in learning more about how speedy deletion works, I have compiled a list of helpful pages at User:SoWhy/SDA. You can of course also contact me if you have questions. Thank you. SoWhy 16:11, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to the world of WP:CSD. It can be confusing but not impossible to understand. Be sure you have twinkle working and turn on your CSD log. If in doubt, use AfD or MfD. Don't be offended if someone then CSD's the nominated page - that just confirms your suspicions. Legacypac (talk) 21:44, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm SparklingPessimist. I noticed that you recently removed content from Bibeltemplet without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. SparklingPessimist Scream at me! 22:22, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, I notice you've been removing press releases uses as sources. You're probably right that these are not great sources in the majority of cases. However, I'd ask you again to perhaps add the "better source needed" template in some cases, instead of just removing a not-so-great citation. I tend to think that some citation is better than no citation in most cases. Also, sometimes a press release is totally fine. Here, for example, the press release was being used to prove that HOC had been a topic covered by the Montel Williams Show. I didn't even bother looking at the press release, but I would bet it's pretty filled with fluff and certainly not an impartial source. However, it serves the purpose intended. I wouldn't use that press release as a citation for, like, any concrete statement about HOC's history, but using it to prove the connection with the Montel Williams Show seems completely fine to me.
Also, please do be careful with your edits. I'm not checking up on you - I only found your Hats Off for Cancer edit because you broke formatting in a way I routinely scan for (and the edit removed some other good content in the process too). No big deal, another editor will often catch errors quickly, but sometimes these things do slip under the radar and affect the readability of an article for a long time. The "preview" button is your friend. :) Best, Jessicapierce (talk) 23:49, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
|
Hi TaxAct2018. Please be careful when editing articles. Your recent removal of references on some pages tripped some of our anti-vandalism alarms. If you are making significant changes to articles it's very important that you explain what you are doing and why. You don't need to write a book, but let people know your thinking behind the edit. Welcome to the project and happy editing. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:57, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Ok, now I am checking up on you a little... :) I noticed that in The Da Vinci Code WebQuests you're still using incorrect formatting on "citation needed" tags. I've fixed it, but please do this correctly in the future to save other people the time (and to make it show up correctly on "citation needed" lists, which will let people find it to fill in said missing citation).
Also, in that case, again, the press release seems like a totally appropriate source to me, as it's in the context of describing a promotional item itself. ThAe case could be made that that's actually the BEST source for that info. It was a dead link, though, so I let your "citation needed" remain. Jessicapierce (talk) 23:59, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Rasun. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 00:18, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
What past account did you use? Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 06:05, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.
If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
at the bottom of your talk page.
You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text ((unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. Thank you. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 17:32, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
TaxAct2018 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. You can easily test this by using the IP address in your proxy settings. It would break your browser. TaxAct2018 (talk) 17:51, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Without your IP - we have nothing to check, or unblock. If you would like to provide your IP more privately, you can use WP:UTRS. SQLQuery me! 14:27, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you recently removed content from Telestrator without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. I'm not sure why you deleted a source and replaced it with a CN tag. Please provide an explanation when making such edits. DonIago (talk) 20:23, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
TaxAct2018 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #20698 was submitted on Feb 21, 2018 19:21:54. This review is now closed.