Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
— Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Hello, nice meeting you. Do you remember? I mean today is the anniversary day of your first editing: Happy Anniversary! And, andd the best! --Bhadani 15:23, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
I've updated your Doctor Who Timeline a bit; I only found it by chance fixing redirects to The Age of Steel. smurrayinchester(User), (Talk) 09:00, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Well, it actually comes from when My brother and I were sending an email to someone (I can't remember what it was about, but it was pretty serious...), and I said we should sign off with a humerous name.
Me:"Sergeat something..."
My brother: "What?"
Me: (casting around and seeing a lever arch file with the word 'Snopake' on it) "Sergeant Snopake..."
And then it stuck! Where does 'Sceptre' come from? SergeantSnopake 22:07, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
Community Justice is no more. It has been reformed to Concordia. Membership has been transferred.
Concordia is an organization of editors on Wikipedia that strive to encourage civility and fair treatment among all editors in the Wikipedian community, from the Wikignome to the Wikiholic. The project was designed to have a friendly and helpful environment to support any unfortunate Wikipedians that have become victims of incivility, hostility, or continual disrespect.
We currently need help in getting going, and making the community understand our aims. We work for civility. Nothing more, nothing less.
If you have ideas, let us know at our talk page, or on the IRC channel. We aim to spread civility in every way we can.
Should you wish to unsubscribe to future newsletters, please add your name to Wikipedia:Concordia/Do Not Spam.
Thank you for your time. If you need anything, feel free to comment at WT:CCD or come into our IRC channel [1].
- The Concordia council. Delivered by Ian13 13:29, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
Too late! --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 22:35, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
Well, erm, hi. :O I have no idea why I'm talking to you....I guess I am amyway. :P U2 says 'one two three fourteen' in Vertigo...they need to go back to, er, pre-preschool... Well, er, like I said, hi. You seem crazy enough. (No offense to you, that is) OreosTalkContribs 13:20, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for taking the time and consideration to fulfill HighwayCello's request about the sockpuppets on WP:AN. Again, thank you! DGX 16:22, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
...for fixing a-none's vandalism to my page. It's my own fault, for "feeding the trolls". I'll do better next time. :) However, he was already messing with the Nairobi Trio page for reasons unknown, he just accelerated it when I pointed out that not only is he a vandal, he also can't spell ("grammer"). Presumably his IP could be blocked. Wahkeenah 17:33, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
Hey there Sceptre,
As an administrator who has almost 10,000 edits I understand that you have been here in Wikipedia for a while and you know how it works. Would you please be kind enough to share your thoughts in Talk:List of Lost episodes#Put all the pictures back and Talk:List of Lost episodes#Outrage at Ed_g2s?
Thank you very much
mo-- (Talk | #info | ) 19:34, 30 May 2006 (UTC) PS. I love what you did to your user and talk page :P
Are you...watching me? Or Nathanrdotcom? STALKER!!!! SergeantSnopake 12:18, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
I know, I don't know what to do about it. If I had a heart of stone, I really would only have the users I admire (and I wouldn't have all my friends), but ever since Nathan put himself on the list (way back when it was like/admire), saying, "Well, I know you like me well enough to list me here, so I guess it's not too presumptuous to list myself", I really didn't want to kick him off, because I like him so much (even though it was just for users who weren't officially my friends). I think I'm just going to have to change the category. SergeantSnopake 11:15, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
Oh, Will, you can't be thinking of leaving!! What happened? Surely it can't be as bad as you think? How did you make a mistake on the mailing list? Surely it can't be as bad as leaving standard? Oh, please, I must implore you, don't leave! SergeantSnopake 16:02, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi Sceptre. Just thought that you might like to know that I have warned Bttfpromo for his uncivil behaviour. As you can see from above, people still like you here, and you are respected as a user. It would be a great shame to lose you from this project. I hope that everything quiets down, and that yo feel that you can continue editting. If you need to talk about anything, please feel free to leave me a message. The Halo (talk) 16:41, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
Geez you guys can't take a joke. If it wasn't obvious, it was a joke. I'm sorry if I hurt your feelings. Bttfpromo 00:09, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
If you leave, I will delete you ;) — Nathan (talk) 06:35, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
I know, it was the weirdist thing, but I dreamt about it all last night! I'd send you some back, but I just can't give in to the new Docotor Who ;) SergeantSnopake 10:12, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
A rouge admin has deleted the userbox page. You should do something. SergeantSnopake 13:23, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
You mean Doc glasgow? He deleted the Civility Noticeboard with the reason of "fuck off". What a way to leave! If I left, it would just be delete all my stuff and go...not get all rouge about it (not that a mere user has the capacity to get rouge about anything). — Nathan (talk) 06:37, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi. I was wondering if you could block 204.38.47.178 for vandalism. I can't as i'm not an admin. Thanks. The Halo (talk) 14:01, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Don't worry, The JPS has blocked him. Thanks anyway. The Halo (talk) 14:07, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
'Fraid not, cos I have to share this computer (stupid no internet connection till you're 18 rule...) but I can email you my email adress, if you like (I'd rather not put it here, any vandal could be watching). SergeantSnopake 14:25, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
You seem to have abused your admin tools . Please reconsider what you are up to. The first suggestion is to comunicate and to carfully folow policy. signed: Zeq. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.63.43.78 (talk • contribs) 21:01 2 Jun 2006 (UTC)
If one user (as I can see above) has just been blocked for vote stacking, maybe this case also deserves attention? Pecher Talk 20:59, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
The policy is clear in allowing cross posting for votes and just require a clean-up:
"Clean up your mess. For example, after engaging in cross-posting to promote some election, be sure to remove those cross-posts after the election is complete. "
In any case, it is customary to first place a warnning instead of applying a block. If you would have done that I would stop. (only posted to 6-7 users anyhow)
See this which explain to what you should have doen (and should have known as admin):
You have acted against WP:Block by not placing a message on the talk page or on any other admin notice board , instead you unilatherly appliad a block.
Your behaviour was a mystory to me (you are after all just a 15 Yr old kid) until you wrote this "Zeq's being acting in bad faith all week" which mean you have an issue with my criticism and the content I dispute. So you have now reveled yourself to act against WP:AGF (you dispute my good faith in clear violation of the policy) and in addition, since you don't like my edits you have again violated WP:BLOCK#When_blocking_may_not_be_used. this is the biggest problem in what you have done
I am forced to edit using an anon IP since you have failed to comunicate with me on my talk page (the only place open to me while I blocked).
Looking at your contribution page I see that you think of yourself as somekinfd of a special police force going and blocking people left and right. let me suggest this: cool down or yo u risk loosing the tools you like so much. Now be civil and please unblock me. Despite all your misuse of power I will see this as a civil warnning not to spanm and will avoid that. Simple, honest, direct and polite communication is most often enough. signed by : Zeq editing from 85.65.186.191 10:14, 3 June 2006 (UTC) PS when this posted on my talk page (as well as twenty other user pages) and had inluded a image which I found distastfull I did not see any admin jumping up and down and crying : SPAM : User_talk:Zeq#Request_for_Editor_.2F_User_Page_Review
Just to let you know, I've unblocked Liftarn, see this discussion. It seems that SirIsaacBrock was misrepresenting Liftarn's actions, and by consensus is himself now blocked for a week for personal attacks. --bainer (talk) 01:17, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for reminding me about the Podmore thing. Yeah, the HP series has always been funny. But the thing is that I dont like the bespectacled boy, I just like the books. ;) Roflol!! --Nearly Headless Nick 14:43, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
So, you quitted? Who else do you ever see participating? Apart from that time General Eisenhower started that dodgy council, I never see anyone doing anything. SergeantSnopake 15:05, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Could you kindly give an explanation as to why you blocked me.. The reason you had given is bizare!! I had already apologized for my mistake and I had not known spamming is against wikipedia policy, I had not done anything wrong after the warning given to me by a fellow editor. So why did you have to block me? I am disappointed with the way you are using your admin priveleges.. Very disappointed.. Such behaviour by admins only gonna turn away good editors.. «₪Mÿš†íc₪» (T) 19:56, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for stepping into this again. It appears like this may be a long-term problem, and he certainly seems to have a lot of time to engage in this behavior. What is the best way to deal with this kind of thing? Simishag 22:28, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Also, can you look into the IP address logs of User:Bucsrsafe? I have a strong suspicion that he is a sockpuppet of User:Hganesan. Simishag 00:58, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
Perhaps you want to leave him a message, denying his unblock, or something to clear up his confusion? NSLE (T+C) at 02:23 UTC (2006-06-04)
Thanks for continually reverting the vandalism to my User Page. Batman2005 03:13, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
Don't you think an indefinite block is a little harsh? The editor wasn't yet told that he will be blocked from Wikipedia, and usually for people who write nonsense articles a 24-hour-block seems like a fair first step. I'd advise you to reconsider. Grandmasterka 03:22, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
Please remember, when adding template parameters to templates, use three curly braces } instead of two. I have fixed the parameter. --GeorgeMoney T·C 03:02, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
I have added more parameters to the template, but since it is subst'ed, the changes won't show up for a while. --GeorgeMoney T·C 03:44, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the welcome back. It sorta feels good to be handling things again. ;-) The King of Kings 03:43, 5 June 2006 (UTC)