Welcome
Welcome to my talk page. Feel free to leave a message. =P
References were changed to conform to MLA standards, as that's the standard with which I'm familiar. Apparently, Wikipedia has okay'd any citation style as long as the style is consistent throughout an article. I don't really care about which style the article uses. MLA looks cleaner to me though than the nonauthoritative Wikipedia citation style. Plus, the cite template increases the size of the entry in the database, increases load times, and uses more system resources—all things that I also don't really care about but which I received a lot of flack for in creating Template:Infobox Company. *shrug* Adraeus (talk) 08:22, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:PC aquanox 2 box.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:25, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nintendo nerd. Since you had some involvement with the Nintendo nerd redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 19:36, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
The article DiskSpeed32 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NSOFT as there is little indication from the article or a source search of significant coverage.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DrStrauss talk 10:19, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Diskspeed32.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 22 October 2017 (UTC)