Hi Mark Boron! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! --Kmhkmh (talk) 03:19, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks but it was not a happy edition, they blocked me for putting my points of view, I spoke several times with people supporting me but nothing days and days to talk "was lost time" I dislike ignorant people, I am not happy with this encyclopedia there are editors who do not accept the view of anything and nobody's and are not administrators. (Mark Boron (talk) 22:20, 9 September 2020 (UTC))[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Wikipedia:List of largest empires (Square Kilometeres). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 8#Wikipedia:List of largest empires (Square Kilometeres) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.

--

I assume you're new to this and haven't quite got the hang of it yet. We don't normally move things to the Wikipedia space if they break the guideline on original research.

I am listing the redirect Wikipedia:List of largest empires (Square Kilometeres) for deletion because it's not a plausible way for people to find the article. If you feel that the article needs to be deleted or moved, there are processes available at WP:AFD (for deletion) or WP:RM (for moves). However, by the looks of things I think you just need to discuss your edits with other editors on the talk page, using dispute resolution if it comes to it.

Thanks for your edits. Kahastok talk 20:35, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks For Correction (Mark Boron (talk) 22:11, 8 September 2020 (UTC))[reply]

No, you can't just revert everyone and then sit a 31 hr block out. I've revised the duration to indefinite. if you wish to be unblocked, read the template you just removed to see how. --Floquenbeam (talk) 16:09, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks, I just wanted to help, I contribute to a complex review, with sources, but the user TompaDompa is not the owner of the list, and is not an administrator, and does not let anyone contribute and edit for many months, he was blocked several times but still remains there and does not allow anyone to make changes to the list, could you review my changes I made on the page? which is the same as wikipedia in the various languages. Could you as an administrator review the changes? Thank you and have a nice day (Mark Boron (talk) 17:02, 9 September 2020 (UTC))[reply]

User:TompaDompa has never been blocked. And this does not explain the repeated blanking of the report at WP:ANI. --Floquenbeam (talk) 17:37, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ok, if you think it's okay, The DompaTompa when reverting the changes of people, violates the free encyclopedia, every people is free to edit, I think (Mark Boron (talk) 18:03, 9 September 2020 (UTC))[reply]

You're not addressing any of my concerns, so I won't be checking back anymore to see if you're commenting. I've explained how to request an unblock if you decide to interact more honestly. --Floquenbeam (talk) 18:11, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

sorry, send me how it is done i was never blocked so i don't understand anything how it works (Mark Boron (talk) 18:15, 9 September 2020 (UTC))[reply]

I don't really care if I was blocked or not, I am interested in changing what is wrong on the page, if not more Portuguese people will complain on the page until you put the correct information, because we don't like people who think they are smart and that they put the wrong information, and you as an administrator should see that Portuguese people complain ah months ago, have you seen how many Portuguese complaints in this page? We put your information as correctly as possible and with common sense, and we demand that you do the same, otherwise I don’t even know where this is going, I joined the discussion at the request of a friend asking for help to resolve the situation, because I thought they would put the right information, time lost days and days and they insisted not to put the information, you as administrator should see the case because we are in a free encyclopedia and not encyclopedia censorship. (Mark Boron (talk) 02:21, 10 September 2020 (UTC))[reply]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Roqui15, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

--Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:10, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh My God so Good People, I don't really care if I was blocked or not, I am interested in changing what is wrong on the page, if not more Portuguese people will complain on the page until you put the correct information, because we don't like people who think they are smart and that they put the wrong information, and you as an administrator should see that Portuguese people complain ah months ago, have you seen how many Portuguese complaints in this page? We put your information as correctly as possible and with common sense, and we demand that you do the same, otherwise I don’t even know where this is going, I joined the discussion at the request of a friend asking for help to resolve the situation, because I thought they would put the right information, time lost days and days and they insisted not to put the information, you as administrator should see the case because we are in a free encyclopedia and not encyclopedia censorship. (Mark Boron (talk) 02:22, 10 September 2020 (UTC))[reply]