This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

On 10 January 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Charles Edward, Duke of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the leader of the German Red Cross under the Nazi regime had lived in the UK until he was fifteen years old and was a grandson of Queen Victoria? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Charles Edward, Duke of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Charles Edward, Duke of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

WaggersTALK 00:02, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 20,479 views (853.3 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of January 2024 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Precious

Victorian era good articles

Thank you for quality articles for the front page around history of Wales and beyond, such as Victorian era, Charles Edward, Duke of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha and Curriculum for Wales (2022–present), for reviewing good articles, for a clear user page (with an infobox present from the start in 2017 and the present one a delight!) - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2903 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:42, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Thank you Gerda Arendt :)--Llewee (talk) 13:08, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

You are welcome ;) - reading the article, where would you like comments, - here or on the article talk? Should I make changes, such as adding a comma, and you revert if you don't like, or should I just propose? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:08, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

@Gerda Arendt (a) I think the article talk would be the best place to keep a record. (b) Whichever you would prefer. Llewee (talk) 16:25, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Your reversal here really surprises me. How important is it to you personally to leave that question open and unclear for the reader? On the talk page you only wrote that you consider the matter trivial. Yet you continue to act to have it your own way. Have you done so much (good) work on that article now that you need a break before you can be accused of ownership there? Or at least I suggest you let the well-motivated little "trivial" input of another editor or two slip through while you are so very heavily involved there. It is not our purpose at Wikipedia to randomly go through articles and zap relevant wording at will. SergeWoodzing (talk) 09:10, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Please don't be personally unpleasant about me. I have work do now. I'll talk to you about this issue later.--Llewee (talk) 09:57, 14 February 2024 (UTC)