Archives

Index Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present.

Just to make sure we're on the same page:

• You see that the subheading in the infobox says "Part of The Burma campaign" because that's how the | partof = section of the template is rendered ...
• and you understand that "The" should not be capitalised because "the" is not a part of a title of a work?

Yue🌙 00:06, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Look at two of the articles you edited recently, where "the" is capitalised in neither article:

• Battle of Liège: "Part of the Western Front of the First World War"
• Operation Bowery: "Part of the Battle of the Mediterranean of the Second World War"

Yue🌙 00:08, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Yue: Not everyone does it but when in for a B class review it's usually recommended; I am working on Bowery to get it to B class standard and haven't finished. You might enquire at the Milhist talk page here Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history in case this had changed. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 00:20, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Keith-264: Can you link the project recommendation or discussion / consensus so I can understand why this apparent contradiction of MOS:CAPS is B-class standard? Yue🌙 00:29, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Yue: I'm afraid not. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 00:58, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Operation Albumen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Axis.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:03, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't count a "special assistance" as a co-author. I imagine that that's somebody who provided a lot of data, etc., but didn't actually write anything. Otherwise they'd be listed as a co-author, n'est-ce pas? Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 11:18, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sturmvogel 66: My 2005 copy has special assistance on the title page and shared copyright on the biblio page, that's enough for me. regards Keith-264 (talk) 11:27, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Worldcat has all three contributors listed as authors.[1] Keith-264 (talk) 11:30, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think that we'll have to agree to disagree on this. So long as we respect existing cites and don't try to change one to another, we should be good.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:38, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, regards Keith-264 (talk) 13:21, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I reverted your earlier page move to "Action at Point 175", as it was undiscussed and the article itself still calls it "Battle of Point 175". I assume you still want it changed, so in that case would you open a WP:RM discussion for it? Thanks. -- asilvering (talk) 19:53, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to German Capture of Moresnet. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Stifle (talk) 09:40, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Arnhem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Lord.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]