|
Hello, Jmao1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.
I notice that one of the first articles you have edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been reverted for this very reason.
To reduce the chances of deletion, you might like to draft your article before submission, then get me or any other editor to proofread it. To start creating a draft article, just click your user name at the top of the screen when you are logged in, and edit that page as you would any other. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.
The one firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that if more than one person is using this account to edit, then unfortunately it will be blocked from editing.
If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type ((helpme))
on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Peter Chastain (talk) 02:58, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi! Peter, thank you for the instructions on how to fix the issues on my article "RHUB". I have rolled back to the point where Airplaneman reviewed. Please give a proof read. I am a new user. Your assistance is very much appreciated.
Jmao1 (talk) 07:09, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.
A tag has been placed on RHUB, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add ((hangon))
on the top of RHUB and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Haakon (talk) 09:58, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
The following is a log of conversation with Haakon in order to avoid the same contest process again for my first article -- RHUB
RHUB is a notable company in the industry. I have carefully followed the templates and tone from other companies in the same industry, particularly ReadyTalk, which seems fully complying with Wikipedia. Please advise me what languages in the writing are considered as spam. Any edition from you would be very much appreciated. Please don't consider my RHUB article as a spam simply because someone else made a mistake in writing an article about RHUB.
Jmao1 (talk) 10:44, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
Notability has to be demonstrated through citations of significant sources. Haakon (talk) 10:51, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
I added "Awards/Recognitions" as ReadyTalk does to improve the notability. Thank you for the feedback! Jmao1 (talk) 11:06, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
I have put my article "under construction". I do need help from editors to make my article work. I have done everything I can by following a good Wikipedia article. Your assistance is much appreciated. Jmao1 (talk) 11:20, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
What is http://www.socialmedian.com/story/8473361/rhub? I won't spend my time for that! I cannot correct it either. Jmao1 (talk) 11:42, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
It was a Google hit on the exact verbage in the article, but I see now that the site was actually a Wikipedia mirror, so I made an error and threw around a false accusation, and I apologise. Haakon (talk) 11:48, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
Thank you! I will not change a word after this article is accepted. It is too stressful! Jmao1 (talk) 11:51, 23 November 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.13.161.90 (talk)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is RHUB. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RHUB. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2009 (UTC)