Hello, Hermes101, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Paul Joseph Rovelli, seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see:

• Policy on neutral point of view
• Guideline on spam
• Guideline on external links
• Guideline on conflict of interest
• FAQ for Organizations

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can write ((helpme)) below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and how to develop articles
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• Article wizard for creating new articles
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 19:09, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Widr (talk) 19:16, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Paul Joseph Rovelli. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 19:17, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Paul Joseph Rovelli with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. DVdm (talk) 19:23, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• OK--things like this are not reliable sources. Please see WP:RS. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 19:30, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(ClueBot left a "final warning" here but I'm undoing it as the edit was not vandalism.) — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 19:46, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Paul Joseph Rovelli has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Paul Joseph Rovelli was changed by Hermes101 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.851211 on 2015-06-03T21:48:10+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:48, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would ask that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on Talk:Paul Joseph Rovelli. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 09:10, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hermes101. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Paul Joseph Rovelli, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

• Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
• Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
• Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 05:46, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Joseph Rovelli is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Joseph Rovelli until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 08:33, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 11:59, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hermes101 all your edits to date have been about Paul Joseph Rovelli. This makes your account what we call a "single purpose account" (please see WP:SPA) You have already been given notice of our Conflict of Interest guideline and Terms of Use - I am following up on that.

Wikipedia is a scholarly project, and like all scholarly endeavors, disclosure of conflict of interest is essential for ensuring the integrity of Wikipedia and retaining the public's trust in it.

Would you please let me know if you have any relationship with Paul Joseph Rovelli or his church? You can reply here - I am watching this page. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 18:33, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]