Hello. I am proposing to begin an "East Asian task force" sub-section of the Military History WikiProject, or perhaps task forces dedicated solely to Korean or Japanese military history, if there is enough support. I have noticed (and appreciated) your work on articles relating to samurai history, and other elements of Far East culture and history. I invite you to lend your comments and/or support. The proposal is linked here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history#Far East Task Force Proposal. Thank you. LordAmeth 15:17, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

which part is the "damage?" show me the examples. otherwise, stop reverting. --SummerThunder 20:12, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

why do you suggest to block it about the "blocking" itself? then revert everything? are you imposing self sencorship, too?--SummerThunder 20:18, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to the Siege of Osaka. It's certainly a page which could use some expansion. Can you please cite your sources, though? You seem like a trustworthy contributor, but if you weren't, I would not have any idea whether or not to trust such things as number changes (on the strength of the armies). Thank you. LordAmeth 08:16, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure I will help translate it for you, but the main problem is that I don't know those individuals' names in English. I read through the passage in chinese and realize that if you translate those names into English, you're almost finish with the whole translation. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 12:19, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There're still too many names that needs to be translated. I think you're better fit for translation because Japan history is not really my department. My department would be science and environment. Those articles will be the easiest for me to translate. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 13:17, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was a bit busy lately helping Biography Summer Assessment drive and starting a completely new task force for environmental record along with adding info and pictures to dragon boat. I'll sort the article that needs translating asap. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 15:31, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have done translation, but I don't think I did a great job because I don't know much about the history of Japan at that time and I missed out some translation. Please check and fix any errors that I made. On a sidenote, please help me support in overturning the deletion of a template that you're very familar of in chinese wikipedia but encounter diffculities implementing in english wikipedia. Check out Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 June 24#Template:Good article. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 17:13, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear: Flamelai ：

In the past meet-ups, we always had our meeting in the centre of Kowloon, either Kowloon Tong or Mong Kok. However, apart from these places, I am sure that alternative venues in other region would be suitable.

This is the time for your suggestion! According to some discussion on Chinese Wikipedia, from August of 2007, the Hong Kong Wikimedians’ meet-up would be held in all districts of Hong Kong in a circulation basis.

Here is the tentative information of the first meet-up：

Date：11, August, 2007 (Saturday)

Time：After 5:00pm

Proposed region：Yuen Long

The community would request for ideas of where we should hold the meet-up , in order to have a better decision. If you have any good ideas, don’t hesitate to give your opinions, million thanks!

Please don't hesitate to give your good suggestion to us

Regards,

Hong Kong Wikimedian

Sith lord darth vader

04:40, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry to tell you that I couldn't come. This is because I'm back to Canada after summer and starting my 2nd year in university. From the current situation, it seems like I won't come back to Hong Kong for vacation for next 3 summers. With warm regards, OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 02:44, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding names to my Redwatch subpages. They are my personal watchlists to assist with the maintenance of articles I have created. Only I can set the limits and decide what is and isn't included. By adding names without my permission you are providing me with unwanted extra work. Please respect this. Thank you, Zafonic (talk) 07:06, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear: Flamelai ：

Wikimedia Hong Kong has been founded two year ago. Today, we would like to invite you to a great event for our second anniversary celebrations, that is co-host by us - Digital Content Jam 1.0, which is belongs to The 3C Digital Creativity Dialogue Series -- Creativity, Content, Community.

This is the information of the event：

Date: 31, July, 2009 (Friday)

Time: From 7:00pm to 9:30pm

Venue: eTech Centre Meeting Room M2 &3, 4/F Opulent Building, 402-406 Hennessy Road, Wan Chai（Google map）

Language: Cantonese

Free snacks and drinks will be served!

Please register via the link below to tell us if you would like to join the event.

Registration Form

Regards,

Hong Kong Wikimedian

Tango Chan×Chat with me

10:24, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Philip Cross. I noticed that you recently removed content from MintPress News without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Philip Cross (talk) 10:31, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page MintPress News has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. In your first edit, you described your removal of legitimate content as "delete vandalism". Philip Cross (talk) 10:35, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Western Watchdog. --Flamelai (talk) 12:24, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Mike Pompeo, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 20:17, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. Western Watchdog. --Flamelai (talk) 08:20, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please be careful about what you say to people. Some remarks, such as your addition to User talk:Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d can easily be misinterpreted, or viewed as harassment. Wikipedia is a supportive environment, where contributors should feel comfortable and safe while editing. Thank you. Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 19:49, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -Lemonaka‎ 16:02, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No response today. Flamelai (talk) 15:34, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  Courcelles (talk) 16:02, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As foreseeable, I will not response on my account activities, to prevent any possible BULLYING. --Flamelai (talk) 14:28, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Flamelai I don't and will never have any intention to bully you, which has been explained on Chinese Wikipedia. We just want to make your account safe and sound, when you confirmed that your account was still controlled by yourself, I even eagerly withdrew all the request for CU, ban and anything like that.
As explained before, please assume good faith. You are a trusted editor on this project, and I really hope you will come back in future. -Lemonaka‎ 09:05, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Flamelai (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have fully control of account. Flamelai (talk) 09:35, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are not blocked for losing control of your account, you are blocked for being not here to build an encyclopedia. 331dot (talk) 13:08, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is legal threat of user:Flamelai. Thank you. -Lemonaka‎ 16:53, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is really out of the line. If you hadn't made that comment, everything would be solved through Standard offer, but making legal threat against blocking admin is really a disastrous behaviour for your own trust on this project. -Lemonaka‎ 16:54, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, global ban ME AGAIN! --Flamelai (talk) 10:01, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]