Archives

Divided by quarter 2019: 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th 2020: 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th

Darn implicit biases! Although I would much rather have a thoughtful, respectful Wikipedian like you identify and kindly fix one of my implicit gender biases than have the bias continue it's secret sabotage in my brain. I really appreciate your courtesy edit (diff). :0) Mark D Worthen PsyD (talk) [he/his/him] 14:16, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Crossroads ^-talk- 15:40, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I mistakenly undid your edit. It was a slip of the finger and I immediately undid it.Editor2020 (talk) 02:18, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, I've done that myself. Crossroads ^-talk- 02:53, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Crossroads. I'm the person who proposed revisions of the postmodernism entry. I'm giving up. It would take too much time to make the entry what it should be. If you have an interest in doing so, I'm convinced the proper way to proceed would be a complete rewrite from start to finish. Piecemeal revisions of individual sentences, paragraphs, or sections result in a mess. And the current entry is quite a mess because of such piecemeal revision over time. Better to start over and redo the whole thing at one go. Good luck. Mryan1451 (talk) 19:40, 13 October 2020 (UTC)Mryan1451 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mryan1451 (talk • contribs)

Thanks for your edits to human sexuality. I am looking to put this through a GA review at some point and the Psychology section is probably my weakest area. I ended up mostly pulling from other articles as you probably realised. I know you are well versed in Human Sexuality here, but wondered if you had any expertise on some of the other aspects in that section (i.e. sleep, consciousness, motivation etc)? AIRcorn (talk) 08:31, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Aircorn: No problem; thank you for improving that article. It's good to see the problem tags get taken down and to see it improve, as there is no shortage of research about that particular species and it gets a lot of interest, haha. Unfortunately I don't think I will be of much help in those other areas. Still, I'll try to read it more and keep watching it, in case I can help in some way. Crossroads ^-talk- 20:46, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've semi-protected the Non-consensual condom removal article for a month to stop the IP-hopping disruptive edits. If you run into any further problems with this disruptive editor, please let me know, and I will try to do something about it. -- The Anome (talk) 09:47, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Crossroads ^-talk- 22:26, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the tough time you are going through. I wouldn't necessarily call "black liberation" a vague term, its more of an umbrella term. For the BLVC their dedication to "Black liberation and collective liberation" is probably best explained with this source. So basically "committed to dismantling systems of oppression and violence. The organization’s work is centered in healing and transformative justice principles, and nurturing the state’s emerging Black leadership to lead powerful campaigns." Either way I didn't find your comment the least bit racist and I hope this find you well.AlmostFrancis (talk) 01:47, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate this, thank you. Crossroads ^-talk- 02:06, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I would like to inform you of this (in french, ″feu″ means dead), and to assure you, if any needs, that the reason of my intervention on WP:RA was to prevent a risk of future false accusation of SP, not to dissuade you to help for a welcomed cleaning. Out of WP, I discovered that the problem is larger in France than estimated, as some high school books endorsed the idea. Cheers. --Pa2chant.bis (talk) 08:26, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Crossroads, You may not quite believe this, but I have just noticed that a Dispute resolution noticeboard thread has been opened without any notification to any editor who opposed the non-referenced content being placed in the Wow! signal page. Best regards, David J Johnson (talk) 12:08, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Opalzukor (talk) 20:00, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just to inform you that ExoEditor has again opened a Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion, despite being rejected a few days ago. Regards, David J Johnson (talk) 19:33, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Wow! signal and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks, Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 20:00, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The filing editor failed to let you know about the request. In my capacity as a clerk, I am doing that for them. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 20:00, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]