Hello, I'm FlightTime. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Rush (band), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 01:04, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Template:NeXT Computer. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - FlightTime (open channel) 01:05, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Tymon.r. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to M. A. Wetherell—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Tymon.r Do you have any questions? 09:25, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
Hello, CherokeeJack1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Sm8900 (talk) 20:15, 5 March 2020 (UTC) Sm8900 (talk) 20:15, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Trap Queen. Binksternet (talk) 18:31, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Retro style, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Davis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:58, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
On 20 April 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Gene Deitch, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. SpencerT•C 21:50, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Q788771, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
PKHilliam (talk) 15:01, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:04, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Gangsta rap into Hip hop music. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted ((copied)) template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 14:47, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Bouncing Off the Satellites. Binksternet (talk) 05:11, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm GoneIn60. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Blockbuster LLC, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. GoneIn60 (talk) 08:13, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Netherzone. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Atomic Age (design), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Netherzone (talk) 19:54, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Regarding your edit here, please do not make massive changes to the section's long standing status quo text and organization without consulting the talk page first. You did this exact same thing back in February and there was already a talk page discussion regarding that.
The current version of the section is organized the way it is for the following reasons:
---
Unrelated to the above, but do you think the 2014 US Pirg report is notable enough to be included? 2014 seems a bit outdated and it's only used once in a transportation report. Some1 (talk) 23:40, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:08, 17 July 2020 (UTC)CherokeeJack1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
How was the information I added incorrect/unsourced? In the second source on the very sentence I edited, it cites "Nason, Leslie J." as the author of that 1963 Daily Press article. In fact it's a direct link to the article.CherokeeJack1 (talk) 02:06, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Firstly, you appear to be referring to one incident, apparently not having taken in the fact that the block was not for one incident: it was for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. You are unlikely to be unblocked as long as it seems you do not understand what you were blocked for. Secondly, you give no indication what edit you are referring to, apparently expecting administrators to search through your editing history to find out what you are referring to. It is entirely likely that that is one of the reasons your unblock request has not been dealt with before. Thirdly, you appear to be referring to an edit you made in the article Baby boomers. In that edit you said that The first recorded use of "baby boomer" was by Leslie J. Nason. The cited article does not say, or even imply, that the use in question was the first recorded use, and you did not cite any other source which does say that; thus your claim was unsourced. Again, you are unlikely to be unblocked as long as it seems you do not understand what you were blocked for. JBW (talk) 19:17, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Calling All Stations Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tony Banks.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add bogusly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Baby boomers. Toddst1 (talk) 00:00, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Neon sign. SolarFlashDiscussion 03:21, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Retro style. SolarFlashDiscussion 16:56, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Bis (Scottish band). SolarFlashDiscussion 17:11, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hip hop music, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Snap.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi CherokeeJack1 and/or administrators viewing this talk page, a complaint about recent edits was created, and declined without any action for now, at Special:Permalink/973700878. Best regards, ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:40, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
As a reply to your question and regarding your use of WP:SYNTH ("Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources"):
And this is not the first time you added WP:SYNTH to articles; you did the exact same thing over at the Generation X article: here, here, and here, and were reverted every single time by multiple different editors.
Also, please take the time to familiarize yourself with WP:BAREURLS. Some1 (talk) 01:30, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
Before making massive changes to the structure and organization of the section, please do it edit by edit so editors can actually see what you're trying to change. The diff view [4] is not that great for trying decipher and compare the old vs the new version, especially when sentences are being moved around or changed.
Also copy and paste the message you left on my talk page here so we can discuss those changes on your talk page instead. Some1 (talk) 04:57, 21 August 2020 (UTC)