A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Hello, AddInfinty!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 18:33, 27 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You rejected this list for lack of Notability, but other D3 Sports, D1 Wrestling, and D2 Wrestling all have their own lists, so I find it inconsistent to argue that D3 Wrestling is too niche to not have it's own Page. The thing that should not be taken into account is what is considered notable enough to have it's own list so far, and given that D3 Wrestling sits at the Crossroads of D3 Sports and College Wrestling, both things which are considered notable enough to have their own lists, it should also have it's own list. The NCAA Website is a Primary Source, not a secondary source, so that is not a valid reason to reject the page. I am not sure what else you are looking for as a source?