Wikipedia should be consistent, and, most importantly, good.

? Did you ever realize that these boxes are the equivalent of putting an obnoxious sticker on the back of your company-issued laptop? This user lives in the U.S. State of Minnesota. This user is interested in religion as a sociological and psychological phenomenon. This user has a Twitter account. This user is Facebook-free. ><> This user is a fish. "Bob" This user has a lot of Slack. This user believes that anyone who thinks Wikipedia is an unreliable source should continue their quest to find a better website.

You'll usually find me hanging around Recent Changes, reverting crap I come across.

I guess I do stuff here besides that, too.

If you have a problem with an edit of mine, please feel free to discuss it on my talk page.

Tools I use

• Chromium - Primary web browser.
• GNU Emacs - Text editor, only use when edits require more complicated markup.
• Pandoc - Because I can hardly stand using Wiki markup, I use this to convert Markdown text to it. Unfortunately, it becomes basically useless with the more esoteric side of things.
• OpenSUSE Tumbleweed - The only Linux distribution.
• i3 - I was using GNOME before this; It finally clicked for me a while back, and I've never been happier. I've tried out Sway in the past, but ended up going back to i3 every time; Mainly because of issues with Wayland.
• Alacritty - Just works. Under Wayland, I use a more obscure terminal emulator named Foot.
• Toolforge Citer - Literally the only tool needed for citation. I don't like how sluggish Wikipedia's own built-in citation tool is, so I just use this one, which is much faster and just better all around, instead.

What I've worked on

Articles

• Alçıtepe
• Atomwaffen Division
• Fredrick Brennan
• QAnon
• Tello, Huila

Images that I've either created, or minified

KILROY WAS HERE!