Learning, editing and publishing is a useful pursuit. I hope to add value to Wikipedia. I enjoy shortening wordy sentences and reorganizing articles. I enjoy interactions with pleasant editors. I do not like unkindness; this is not X (formerly known as Twitter).

9/26/23 - I just made my thousandth edit!

Topics that I follow:

Nonprofit organizations - Finance & accounting - Middle East affairs - Political figures - Religious leaders

Stating the Obvious:

Most people die - Good is better than bad - Racism is wrong - No one is perfect - You cannot please everyone - Prisons suck

Helpful Editors:

User:DESiegel - helped by removing template message from an article I improved with secondary sources - Student Press Law Center

User:NatGertler - helped by patiently advising me on my talk page regarding punctuation and quotation marks on Wikipedia; Helped with figuring out dead links

My Reference List of WP:

The Teahouse

Wikipedia:List of policies

Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents

Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle

Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard

Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines

Wikipedia:WikiProject Organizations

Template:Infobox organizationWikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources

Wikipedia:Neutral point of view#Due and undue weight

Wikipedia:Reliable sources#Biased or opinionated sources

Wikipedia:Consensus#Through editing

Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch#Contentious labels

Wikipedia:Assume good faith

Wikipedia:Requests for comment

Wikipedia:NPOV dispute

Wikipedia:Reliable sources#Self-published and questionable sources as sources on themselves

Wikipedia:Verifiability

Wikipedia:Verifiability#Exceptional claims require exceptional sources

Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Reliable sources

Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard - Use of Headlines

Wikipedia:Editing policy#Try to fix problems

Guide to "logical quotation" at MOS:LQ.

Citation Needed In wiki markup, you can question an uncited claim by inserting a simple [citation needed] tag, or a more comprehensive [citation needed]. Alternatively, [citation needed] and [citation needed] will produce the same result. These all display as:

Example: 87% of statistics are made up on the spot.[citation needed]

Ihaveadreamagain 19:53, 8 July 2020 (UTC) testing signature

If a claim in an article is questionable and not supported by a cited reliable source then it may be challenged by anyone. You can put a ((fact)) tag beside it to request a citation. If it is inaccurate information from a dubious source put a ((Verify credibility)) tag on it – or find correct information and reference it from a reliable source. You also may use ((Verify source)) or ((Failed verification)) tags on it, as appropriate. If the tag has remained there for several days, the unsupported claim should be safe to remove.

Things to do

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/All


"If you see it as your mission to protect article content from anyone who doesn't care about Wikipedia policy, you are a good Wikipedia editor." WP:POVFIGHTER