This template is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This template is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
I was about to ask you the same thing. HMCS Haida but Z 1936 identifies Z-32 as a 36A, could have been a typo in the original? GraemeLeggett 09:58, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure at all. Unfortunately I don't have any good naval books at the moment. Oberiko 14:29, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I know italics are used for ships themselves, but are they also used for ship classes? Oberiko 14:40, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It seems to be the practice, helps distinguish between classes named after a boat eg "Kent class" and those named after groups eg "Town class". I leave the letter ones alone "K class submarine", not "K class submarine". GraemeLeggett 15:00, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Shouldn't the Tirpitz be next to the Bismarck? David schouten12345 15:40, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Its the classes of ships not the actual ships themselves so only Gneisenau (class) and not Gneisenau and Scharnhorst. If you leave you mouse over it the pop-up should show you (in Windows and IE for me)GraemeLeggett 15:57, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Why does the not lead to E-boat? And why do the class names in the torpedo boat section of the template not match the names referenced in the E-boat article? 145.253.108.22 11:33, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]