![]() | Template:Copied is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should be proposed here first. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use ((edit template-protected)) to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases. |
![]() | Text has been copied to or from this page; see the list below. The source pages now serve to provide attribution for the content in the destination pages and must not be deleted so long as the copies exist. For attribution and to access older versions of the copied text, please see the history links below.
|
|
|
Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by lowercase sigmabot III. |
Faced with nine parameters for basic usage, I think that many people will be discouraged from using this template at all.
Couldn't we have an "ultra-basic" or "absolutely minimal" example with just 'from' and 'to'? or 'from' and 'to' and 'date'? Last time I tried, 'from' and 'to' were the minimum that made sense. This would encourage more usage, IMHO.
This is a proposal for the documentation page, not for the template itself. Boud (talk) 01:19, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request to Module:Copied has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Hello! I'm trying to create a userscript for WikiProject Copyright Cleanup editors and noticed that this template doesn't have a specific class to identify it (much like how ((edit semi-protected)) is implemented). I've made the required changes in the module sandbox (diff) and I'd like to request that version to be copied into Module:Copied. It introduces the "copiednotice
" class into the box so that it can be efficiently targeted on rendered talk pages and in Parsoid documents. Chlod (say hi!) 06:06, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request to Module:Copied has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Currently, if a page uses fromX without using from (like here), it'll get put into Category:Wikipedia pages using copied template without oldid incorrectly even if it has a perfectly valid oldidX. I've made a change onto the sandbox version that fixes this. Aidan9382 (talk) 06:37, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request to Module:Copied has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change:
image = '[[File:Splitsection.svg|50px]]',
To:
image = '[[File:Splitsection.svg|frameless|upright=0.23|link=|alt=]]',
...per MOS:BLANKALT and MOS:UPRIGHT. Thanks! HouseBlastertalk 03:49, 28 September 2023 (UTC), edited to add |frameless
15:41, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
"px works the same as upright for users with the usual base width setting of 220px, but works counterintuitively for readers whose base width is set to a different value... For example, an image coded 275px—presumably to make it wider than most images on a particular page—is actually rendered smaller than most images if the user has changed their base width to 300px"(emphasis in original). To convert between the two, you divide the value in pixels by 220, which in this case gives us 0.22727272727... However, because I forgot the frameless param (thank you for sandboxing this... goes to show you even trivial changes should realllllly be tested first), the upright param had no effect on resizing the image. I have edited the sandbox to reflect this, and it should be working now. HouseBlastertalk 15:41, 28 September 2023 (UTC)