The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:50, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Codex of Santa Catarina Ixtepeji[edit]

• ... that the 300-year-old Codex of Santa Catarina Ixtepeji was recently re-discovered and identified in a collection housed at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee?

Created/expanded by Orangemike (talk). Self nom at 18:43, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

• No QPQ required. No images needing checking. Article is new enough and long enough.
• Article is tagged as orphan. This needs to be fixed and tag removed. Article is not fully supported by sources. Fact tags added to make clear where. Fixed hook so it looks properly formatted.
• Cannot do plagiarism check until article fully sourced.
• Hook is ambiguous. What does recently mean? Propose alt that is more clear? Article suffers similar problems "is believed" needs clarity as to whom believes this. Some POV issues because of this as parts of it feel informal: "replied in an e-mail, "Wooooooooooooooowwwwwwww, Es el Códice de Santa Catarina Ixtepeji!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" He knew that was one of the two documents he and van Doesburg had been hunting for so many years." --LauraHale (talk)

Address article tags and other points mentioned. Once done, please ping me on my talk page and on the review page so review can go forward. --LauraHale (talk) 21:59, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

• Addressed comments; no POV in report of this scholar's excited response to unexpected success. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:25, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
• ALT2 "... that the 300-year-old Codex of Santa Catarina Ixtepeji was re-discovered and identified in early 2012 at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (3700 kilometres from its Mexican home), after a search that had spanned two continents and thirteen years?" --Orange Mike | Talk 14:25, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

I feel comfortable with thos now. --LauraHale (talk) 21:35, 16 July 2012 (UTC)