Jews are special, discussion[edit]

Thanks Q for your input and vigilance on the article. I also hesitated yesterday about the 'not well known in Israel' in light of the house arrest but decided to just stick with the sources and left it. I'm also OK with leaving it out. Regarding the every Jew is special, I'm going to look into that because as I remember it, the source made a big deal about this being a significant philosophical belief of Pinto's that was out of step with other rabbis. I'll have a look and post something here for discussion. Thanks again. --KeithbobTalk 16:57, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jerusalem Post Oct 1, 2010:

Other potential content[edit]

Lead[edit]

It needs to be fleshed out sometime, but also it (and the infobox) says Moshat Shuva Israel. I don't remember seeing any sources that say Moshat. Does anyone else? Also, it calls it a ministry. Has that term been used in any sources? Thanks.--KeithbobTalk 19:00, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Arrest & Indictment[edit]

Pinto is under house arrest and facing indictment according to the Largest Israeli media outlets. Why would that not be in the lead is a wonder. Richierichriche (talk) 01:19, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to know your way around Wikipedia quite well, Richierichriche. Tell me, have yu ever edited under any other usernames? -- Dianna (talk) 01:21, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
(EC)WP:NOTNEWS, mostly. We don't lead with something just because it's what's happening right now--we lead with a big summary of his career. Should he actually be indicted, I do think we should probably add something to the lead. If more recent events have occurred, please provide sources here and we can discuss adding them. Qwyrxian (talk) 01:22, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The editor went directly to my talk page and next to Wikipedia:Editor assistance/Requests. he seemed awfully familiar with Wikipedia for someone who only created his account 25 minutes ago, so I blocked as an obvious duck sock. -- Dianna (talk) 01:28, 1 December 2012 (UTC) ‎[reply]
One of his acolytes seems nice. I'll meet that person next time I'm in NYC. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 03:14, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Extended lede - 17/1/14[edit]

I have slightly extended the lede, as requested. As an outsider who had never heard of this person before, I feel that it is the article that is too long, rather than the lede too short. Much of the material seems to me to lack notability to the general reader. Valetude (talk) 13:18, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Legal problems in the lead[edit]

Perhaps someone better versed in the ways of WP:BLP can give some input as to whether the material on Pinto's recent legal problems belong in the lede? My impression was that it's not usual to do this, as it gives such matters undue weight. Also, the wording needs to be tended to, as "mired in controversy over the past few years" implies that there have been multiple controversies, when as far as I can tell there's only one legal problem, which has been ongoing for some time. -- Diannaa (talk) 20:12, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BLPCRIME counsels great care in approaching matters where someone has been accused but not convicted. Here, where an indictment has not even been handed down, I think even greater care should be taken, particularly in light of WP:NOTNEWS. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 23:17, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]