This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
According to what policy? If something is very clearly the primary topic, I'm not at all sure why a move would be considered contested or controversial. Loytra (talk) 02:14, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Socialist Unity Party has gone from primary redirect to dabpage, then back to primary redirect, then back to dabpage. See WP:RMCM: "A move is potentially controversial if (...) there has been any past debate about the best title for the page; someone could reasonably disagree with the move."162 etc. (talk) 04:21, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.