There's no evidence of COPYVIO; I'll be looking for plagiarism while I'm going through the sources. Chris Troutman (talk) 01:45, 23 January 2017 (UTC) All good here. Chris Troutman (talk) 01:18, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This is a well-done article and the first where I didn't have a laundry list of issues to be fixed. I only had the delay of waiting for the inter-library loan books arriving. Other than that, everything is as it ought to be. I would recommend using ((GBP)) in the future so that it allows conversion to other currencies where appropriate as well as depicting how much a pound sterling in 1927 costs now. I'd also have preferred use of ((Sfn)) with many of these citations. Neither of those suggestions matter for this review but I'd fix those ahead of a MILHIST A-class review. I did also notice that the geo-coordinates are about 100ft off but I guess that can't be helped. Chris Troutman (talk) 01:18, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]