This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the ((WikiProject Food and drink)) project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fisheries and Fishing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fisheries, aquaculture and fishing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fisheries and FishingWikipedia:WikiProject Fisheries and FishingTemplate:WikiProject Fisheries and FishingFishing articles
This article is part of WikiProject Fishes, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to Fish taxa. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Fishes. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life.FishesWikipedia:WikiProject FishesTemplate:WikiProject FishesFishes articles
Howdy. The energy to macronutrient ratio seems fishy (ha!). 49 kcal is too low for something that contains 13.9g of fat and 18.6g of protein. Can someone please look into that? —iNkubusse? 11:18, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).[reply]
Might be good to add light tuna to the table as well. Think it's somewhere around 0.11 ppm
Also might be good to have mcg per 4oz serving size as one of the table columns (about 114 x the value in ppm) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.118.202.234 (talk) 23:07, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I think it is odd that as an "encyclopedic" article specifically about a food source, some nutritional information that might be of interest to a typical consumer would be left out (see what were removed), especially the nutritions that the food is a significant source, i.e. Vitamin D, Niacin, Vitamin B6, B12. Heck, you can't even answer a simple question from a statement in the article about Mackerel being a good source of omega-3 fatty acid. (How significant is it? Do I consume it enough from the fish today?) Can we not make this article more useful to more people, and be less subjected to one person's opinion ? --Tikmok (talk) 05:21, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]