List of NGC stars was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 26 June 2020 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into List of NGC objects. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Lists This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Astronomy: Astronomical objects Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.

Why has this been split up without any prior discussion?--Kalsermar 17:58, 29 May 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

As a bold decision, probably. I think it's a good idea; it was getting long, and many other pages do something similar. Ardric47 21:06, 29 May 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It would probably be appropriate to split these pages by 1000s (e.g. 1-999, 1000-1999, 2000-2999, etc). Would anyone object to this? Dr. Submillimeter 11:21, 1 May 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm in the process of merging this. For the sub-lists, I think I'm going to add a column for "discoverer," as this is valid information currently in the article that I'm merging. Thoughts appreciated. Sam-2727 (talk) 04:02, 28 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Why is the Condor Galaxy in this table? Edsanville (talk) 03:45, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]