When did they precisely wed ?[edit]

1/

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.69.180.19 (talk) 14:34, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.69.180.19 (talk) 07:53, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


2/ from the Boston Evening Transcript, 19 January 1889 / Paris, 2 Jan. 1889 "Marrying foreigners - American wives and Titled husbands" :


3/ from the Daily Alta California, Volume 40, Number 13456, 30 June 1886 "They married Titles - American Belles who have become Foreign Noblewomen" :


— Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.69.180.19 (talk) 20:50, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:33, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious article needs cleanup.[edit]

Heiresses? This article is not about the financial gains through inheritance, is it? If it is about inheriting "royal" family names, caution: 1. Austria and Germany abolished monarchy in 1919 and became republics. Since then, all those "von" (or "Prinz", "Freiherr" et al) people with German or Austrian passports are not nobility anymore, as such does not exist as a societal class anymore. Such "titles" have become family names since, and nothing else. 2. Persons who divorced a spouse with such a royal "title", unless they keep that family name in citizenship documents even after the divorce, they are heiresses of exactly nothing. 3. Persons who never legally took up the "royal" family name of the spouse into their legal documents, after marriage are not heiresses of anything, alive or dead. 4. "Baron" has never been a royal title in Germany or Austria. It just never existed.

Underline[edit]

But why is American dollar princesses underlined? jengod (talk) 01:45, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]