This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the ((WikiProject Food and drink)) project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Does it really make any sense to include both the Nepali food and the dance hall in the same article? It's not as if the dance hall were named after the food. 192.4.0.12 (talk) 23:50, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
There seems to be a little bit of ethnic dispute in the recent edits. Should we talk about it and sort this out?
At 2023-12-24T14:00:13, Koikirat started with a big edit changing Limbu people to Kirati people, removing thegrunduk source, and adding a block of legend.
At 2023-12-24T14:27:39, IP editor 103.166.101.84 reverted the infobox change but left the rest alone.
At 2023-12-24T17:09:32, Koikirat removed a kathmandupost source. This was promptly reverted by Wracking.
At 2023-12-25T05:16:36, Koikirat reverted the change from the IP editor.
The later insertion by 2001:df6:2380:2bc9:3067:57ab:b280:ac99 is unrelated to this conflict.
If I am not mistaken, "Limbu" seems to be a subset of "Kirati". Artoria2e5🌉 14:08, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Artoria2e5, thanks for identifying this. I've done a bit of digging, and here's my thoughts:
The entire "Tales of Kinama" section should be removed. This section appears to have been translated a section added to Nepali Wikipedia (ne:किनेमा) in December, which itself appears to be copyright violation from a November Facebook post. In addition to the copyright issues, there's no indication that this Facebook post is a reliable source (WP:UGC).
The "created by" parameter should just be removed from the infobox. It's unnecessary and I don't think it's the point of the parameter (it appears to be for an individual person).
Koikirat's other edits should also be reverted as they involved removing sourced statements without explanation and replacing them with unsourced/unverified statements and major grammatical errors.