GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Basilisk4u (talk · contribs) 22:08, 11 November 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi! I think this article is interesting and has a lot of potential, so I am going to review it for GA. Please bear with me as I currently am a bit busy. Basilisk4u (talk) 22:08, 11 November 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have found a lot of prose issues. However these are easier to fix than sourcing issues, so I will keep reviewing as you have waited a long time for this review.

Notes

Lead

Background

Lawsuit and release

Reception

References

Okay I have finally finished the review. Fix these issues, and you've got yourself a Good Article! Basilisk4u (talk) 19:45, 25 November 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • No worries, I totally understand. My final exams are killing me! Good luck with whatever you may be doing :) Basilisk4u (talk) 03:06, 3 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I know this is taking the mick a bit now, but after all the exam stress im pretty ill. Ive popped on wiki for a couple of secs just to notify people so everything doesnt go crazy. But if you could still give me maybe two more days I promise I will get back to it asap! Thanks and sorry --FeuDeJoie (talk) 22:43, 8 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I have done everything you noted in the review. Lemme know if theres anything else and thanks for your patience :) -FeuDeJoie (talk) 20:16, 9 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A few more things

Hey! I hope you're feeling better. The article has improved so much. Great work! However, I still have a few concerns:

Lead
Background
Lawsuit and release
Reception

Okay now these are my final concerns. After these are addressed, I will pass the article. Yay! Basilisk4u (talk) 03:59, 10 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry for the wait. Christmas time is pretty hectic. But I've addressed all the points :) -FeuDeJoie (talk) 15:16, 22 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]