GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: UnidentifiedX (talk · contribs) 19:06, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello! I’ll be reviewing this article, please allow me a few days to complete the assessments. You can track the progress below: UnidentifiedX (talk) 19:10, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (prose) | The reviewer has left no comments here | Pass |
(b) (MoS) | The reviewer has left no comments here | Pass |
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (major aspects) | The reviewer has left no comments here | Pass |
(b) (focused) | The reviewer has left no comments here | Pass |
Notes | Result |
---|---|
The reviewer has left no comments here | Pass |
Notes | Result |
---|---|
The reviewer has left no comments here | Pass |
Hello! This GA review is slowly coming to end. The copyright violation and extensive plagiarism checks will undergo shortly. This GA review should be finished by tommorrow and any final edits / suggestions will be given then. Thanks, your patience is greatly appreciated. UnidentifiedX (talk) 15:17, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Update: The copyright and plagiarism checks have concluded (with the help of Earwig,) the results have been posted in the assessment criteria table; I will finalise the results now. Thanks for contributing (to) and submitting this article for a GA Nomination, it was a pleasure to review. Have a great day! UnidentifiedX (talk) 15:58, 25 May 2022 (UTC)