![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
||||||||||
|
The main article for Fairy Chess Pieces listed the "nightrider" as the most popular fairy chess piece, while this article claimed that destination to go to it's subject, the "grasshopper." I have changed both references to "one of the most popular," and suggest that in the future anybody who wishes to claim a certain piece as being the most popular cite their facts accordingly. Rudy Breteler (talk) 21:37, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
Fairy chess piece has low importance, yet this Grasshopper (a sub-element of Fairy Chess Piece) has mid importance. This makes little sense. 89.76.218.139 (talk) 12:00, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
Under Betza notation, the grasshopper is a pQ, notation (pQ). Double sharp (talk) 13:25, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
What's the value of grasshopper? 2A01:119F:251:9000:3044:5AA8:3B70:D88 (talk) 07:26, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Here and elsewhere, the cute icons ... They aren't "typical" unless you can find a source which says as much. (Can you even find one example in a chess variants publication where these have been used?) Also placement as lead image does not match the importance or value of the images. (In fact I don't think they belong in any article. Even the mann icons worked on recently. Where did these come from? Never seen them in any chess variant literature.) --IHTS (talk) 15:29, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
I think the problem is supposed to start with "White to move" and should say "White mates in 8". --2A02:908:4B11:8820:6D4B:ED56:C487:906C (talk) 03:53, 19 December 2022 (UTC)2A02:908:4B11:8820:6D4B:ED56:C487:906C