GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Urve (talk · contribs)

Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 23:30, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Holding now (I want to do one more spotcheck but I don't have time rn to chase down the archived version of the reference). Just some copy changes for this short-side article (which makes sense given the lack of critical attention). Ping me when done. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 23:52, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know? If you fancy doing so, I always have plenty of GA nominees to review. Just look for the all-uppercase titles in the Television section. Reviews always appreciated.

Thank you :) I'll probably have more time to do more reviews this summer but perhaps sooner. Done below ... Urve (talk) 11:52, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copy changes[edit]

Sourcing and spot checks[edit]

The Tablet Magazine link is dead. IABot is down or I'd have run it on this article. You'll want to add an archive link and URL. I can't go hunting for it right now, but it will be my third spotcheck in a bit. The two spots I've been able to check look good.

No Earwig issues; someone copied from us, but that's something they can do.

Tablet changed where Sienna's writing was located; I've updated

Images[edit]

Not applicable to this article.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.