Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Starting GA reassessment. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:13, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Checking against GA criteria
[edit]Notified: User:Andreasegde, User:Vera, Chuck & Dave, User:John Cardinal, WP:WikiProject The Beatles, WP:Wikiproject Germany
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
- b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
ref #8 [1] is dead; ref #9 [2] is dead
Done.--andreasegde (talk) 16:41, 11 July 2009 (UTC) Done[reply]
- b (citations to reliable sources):
- c (OR):
- It is broad in its scope.
- a (major aspects):
- b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- tagged and fair use rationales
- b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- All done, good work - keep GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:11, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I'll do it after Magic Alex is done.--andreasegde (talk) 16:32, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I have gone through this with a fine toothcomb, and have cleaned, formatted and deleted.--andreasegde (talk) 12:48, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]