GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: PCN02WPS (talk · contribs) 20:23, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Riley1012 (talk · contribs) 02:26, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PCN02WPS: Hi! I will take a look at this by the end of this week. -Riley1012 (talk) 02:26, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

1. Well-written

2. Verifiable
Copyvio check passed.

  • Okay, if you can find a list of the previous national championship games with record that could work. -Riley1012 (talk) 22:26, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

3. Broad
The article is broad and stays focused on its coverage of the game.

4. Neutral
The article is not biased in its coverage of the game

5. Stable
This article is stable day-to-day, no edit warring.

6. Illustrated
The images in the article are free and have relevant captions- great pictures from Legoktm.

@PCN02WPS: A few issues, but I am happy to pass once these are fixed. -Riley1012 (talk) 20:58, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Riley1012 Thanks for the review! All points above have been done. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 15:18, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@PCN02WPS: Looks good now, thanks! -Riley1012 (talk) 22:26, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.